Product engineering for difficult systems that need a clear path to delivery.
Turn the stuck system into a clear next step
Share the system, business goal, constraints, budget range, and timeline. You will receive a fit decision and the next useful step.
- Response
- Usually within one business day.
What to include
A useful brief makes the goal, constraints, budget, and timing clear enough to decide whether there is a fit.
Budget range
- Diagnostic at USD 350
- Build Sprint from USD 2,500
- Product Partnership custom quote
- Not sure yet
Timing
- Diagnostic in 3 business days
- Sprint in 1-3 weeks
- Partnership roadmap
- Exploring timing
Choose a starting point
Choose the level of commitment that matches the decision in front of you. Pricing follows scope and deliverables, not time sheets.
Fixed fee: USD 350
3 business days
AI & Product Diagnostic
USD 350 fixed. In 3 business days, receive a prioritized technical and product implementation path.
- Best for
- Founders and operators who need clarity before committing to a build.
Included
- Discovery, Analysis, and Delivery across 3 business days.
- A decision package with architecture, roadmap, recommended stack, implementation phases, budget, and timeline.
- Use it to decide whether to build, pause, or change direction before a larger commitment.
Best entry point when the problem is valuable but the path is still unclear.
Starting at: USD 2,500
1-3 weeks
Build Sprint
Starting at USD 2,500, generally 1-3 weeks to deliver a usable slice with a defined scope.
- Best for
- Teams ready to ship a vertical slice, internal workflow, or AI-enabled product path.
Included
- A focused scope tied to one usable product or workflow slice.
- Product, architecture, and implementation decisions stay connected through delivery.
- Start after a Diagnostic or when the target and constraints are already clear.
Designed for momentum when the product decision and constraints are understood.
Custom quote
Product Partnership
Custom quote for systems that need ongoing product and engineering decisions.
- Best for
- Ongoing product and engineering ownership when the system needs sustained decisions.
Included
- Custom roadmap, cadence, and delivery shape.
- Useful for operations software, AI systems, and platforms that need ongoing decisions.
- Quoted from scope, risk, and expected ownership.
Best when GreyX needs to stay close to product decisions beyond one sprint.